<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Internet Community &#187; chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/tag/chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk</link>
	<description>from Gravity Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:15:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Updates Chrome Web Browser with New Features</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-web-browser-with-new-features/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-web-browser-with-new-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet search giant Google has updated its popular slim-line Google Chrome website browser with the first major new release since its initial launch 8 months ago. Elsewhere the browser has also been updated to fix hundreds of stability bugs and can now run JavaScript-heavy web pages about 30% faster than before.

New Features
Improved New Tab Page: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet search giant Google has updated its popular slim-line <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_new">Google Chrome</a> website browser with the first major new release since its initial launch 8 months ago. Elsewhere the browser has also been updated to fix hundreds of stability bugs and can now run JavaScript-heavy web pages about 30% faster than before.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-139" title="chrome" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome.jpg" alt="chrome" width="194" height="137" /><br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>New Features</strong></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Improved New Tab Page:</strong> <em>The most requested feature from users was the ability to remove thumbnails from the New Tab page. Now you can finally hide that embarrassing gossip blog from the Most Visited section.</em></p>
<p><strong>Full Screen Mode:</strong> <em>If you&#8217;ve ever given a presentation or watched a large video using Google Chrome, you might have wished you could use every last pixel on your screen for the content. Now you can hide the title bar and the rest of the browser window by hitting F11 or selecting the option in the Tools menu.</em></p>
<p><strong>Form Autofill:</strong> <em>Filling out your information in forms over and over again can be tedious. Form autofill helps by showing information you&#8217;ve previously entered into the same form fields automatically. If at any point you want to clear out your information, that&#8217;s easy to do from the Tools menu.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Google has said that it will refer to the latest update as <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chrome 2</span>, but that&#8217;s mainly a metric to help them keep track of changes internally. In reality Google prefers to roll out new features as and when they can, irrespective of version numbering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-web-browser-with-new-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Updates Chrome &#8211; Did Anyone Notice?</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-did-anyone-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-did-anyone-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has pushed out an update for its Chrome browser that lances two vulnerabilities, one of which it defines as critical. Google Chrome contains a background updating function so the browser will update itself to the latest version, Chrome 1.0.154.64, unbeknownst to most users.
The critical flaw involves a failure to properly validate input from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has pushed out an update for its Chrome browser that lances two vulnerabilities, one of which it defines as critical. Google Chrome contains a background updating function so the browser will update itself to the latest version, Chrome 1.0.154.64, unbeknownst to most users.</p>
<p>The critical flaw involves a failure to properly validate input from a renderer (tab) process. Successful exploitation of the flaw might allow the injection of hostile code onto vulnerable systems, hence the critical tag.</p>
<div id="article-mpu-container">
<p>The second &#8220;high risk&#8221; flaw involves problems in calculating image size. The security bug creates a means for hackers to crash vulnerable systems, for example after tricking users into visiting malicious constructed websites.</p></div>
<p>Both flaws are explained in more depth in an advisory by Google <a href="http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2009/05/stable-update-security-fix.html" target="_blank">here</a>. It&#8217;s the second time in two weeks that Google has updated its browser software in response to a security problem. A previous update &#8211; issued on 23 April &#8211; addressed an unrelated lower-risk security bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/05/google-updates-chrome-did-anyone-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 Browsers Compared For Speed and Features</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/03/9-browsers-compared-for-speed-and-features/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/03/9-browsers-compared-for-speed-and-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Counting public betas and release candidates, there are a whopping nine different web browsers out today with enough market share to be considered mainstream.
    
Maximum PC explains the differences between the browsers, future and present, so that you can make a more informed decision about the primary tool you use to browse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counting public betas and release candidates, there are a <a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/browser_brouhaha_your_maximum_guide_browsers_today_and_tomorrow">whopping nine different web browsers</a> out today with enough market share to be considered mainstream.</p>
<p><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/firefox.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-134" title="firefox" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/firefox.jpg" alt="" width="92" height="69" /> </a><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ie.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-116" title="ie" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ie.jpg" alt="" width="92" height="69" /></a><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/safari.jpg"> <img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-182" title="safari" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/safari.jpg" alt="" width="71" height="71" /> </a><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-139" title="chrome" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="68" /></a><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ie.jpg"> </a></p>
<p>Maximum PC explains the differences between the browsers, future and present, so that you can make a more informed decision about the primary tool you use to browse the web. From the rendering engines used to the features that set the different browsers apart, this is a comprehensive, blow-by-blow battle between Safari 3, Internet Explorer 7, Firefox 3, Opera 9.6, Google Chrome, Firefox 3.1, IE 8, Safari 4, and Opera 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/03/9-browsers-compared-for-speed-and-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaw exposes Firefox and Chrome to &#8216;clickjacking&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/01/flaw-exposes-firefox-and-chrome-to-clickjacking/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/01/flaw-exposes-firefox-and-chrome-to-clickjacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickjacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security researchers have discovered a flaw affecting Google&#8217;s Chrome browser that exposes it to clickjacking — where an attacker hijacks a browser&#8217;s functions by substituting a legitimate link with a link of the attacker&#8217;s choice.
 
Google has acknowledged the flaw and is working towards a patch for Chrome versions 1.0.154.43 and earlier when running within [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security researchers have discovered a flaw affecting Google&#8217;s Chrome browser that exposes it to clickjacking — where an attacker hijacks a browser&#8217;s functions by substituting a legitimate link with a link of the attacker&#8217;s choice.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/firefox.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-134" title="firefox" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/firefox.jpg" alt="" width="149" height="112" /></a> <a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-139" title="chrome" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="158" height="113" /></a></p>
<p>Google has acknowledged the flaw and is working towards a patch for Chrome versions 1.0.154.43 and earlier when running within Windows XP SP2 systems, <a href="http://www.secniche.org/gcr_clkj.html" target="_blank">according to SecNiche security researcher Aditya K Sood</a>. The flaw was reported on 27 January and has since posted a proof of concept on the Bugtraq vulnerability-disclosure forum.</p>
<p>&#8220;Attackers can trick users into performing actions which the users never intended to do and there is no way of tracing such actions later, as the user was genuinely authenticated on the other page,&#8221; Sood said within the disclosure.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s security researchers had not found any attacks in the wild that exploited the specific vulnerability, said Google&#8217;s spokesperson.</p>
<p>Clickjacking is a relatively new type of browser attack. The attack broadly fits within the category of cross-site scripting forgery, where an attacker uses maliciously crafted HTML or JavaScript code to force a victim&#8217;s web browser to send an HTTP request to a website of their choosing.</p>
<p>Internet Explorer 8 (release candidate 1 and beta 2 versions) and Opera 9.63 (the latest version) are not exposed to the flaw. But, like Chrome, Firefox 3.0.5 is exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2009/01/flaw-exposes-firefox-and-chrome-to-clickjacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox and Chrome Run Gmail Twice as Fast as IE, Says Google</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/firefox-and-chrome-run-gmail-twice-as-fast-as-ie-says-google/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/firefox-and-chrome-run-gmail-twice-as-fast-as-ie-says-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has taken a more aggressive approach to moving users away from Internet Explorer, recommending that Gmail users install Firefox or Chrome if they want to see Gmail run &#8220;an average of twice as fast.&#8221;

When you log into Gmail using Internet Explorer, you&#8217;ll see a &#8220;Get faster Gmail&#8221; link in the set of links across [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has taken a more aggressive approach to moving users away from Internet Explorer, recommending that Gmail users install Firefox or Chrome if they want to see Gmail run &#8220;an average of twice as fast.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/faster-gmail.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-147" title="faster-gmail" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/faster-gmail.png" alt="" width="286" height="156" /></a></p>
<p>When you log into Gmail using Internet Explorer, you&#8217;ll see a &#8220;Get faster Gmail&#8221; link in the set of links across the top of the page. If you follow the link in IE7, you&#8217;ll find yourself at <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?&amp;answer=107906&amp;hl=en">this page</a> (pictured above), which claims that Gmail runs an average of twice as fast on Firefox 3 or Chrome than it does IE.</p>
<p>Strangely enough, that same link in IE6 takes you to <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78160&amp;hl=en">this page</a>, which recommends upgrading to IE7—so you&#8217;re in for a bit of a rollercoaster if you follow their suggestions. We practically never open up IE unless we have to around here, so we certainly can&#8217;t say from experience that IE runs Gmail that much more slowly, so if you&#8217;ve got more experience switching between browsers with Gmail, share your experience in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/firefox-and-chrome-run-gmail-twice-as-fast-as-ie-says-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome browser no longer beta</title>
		<link>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/google-chrome-browser-no-longer-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/google-chrome-browser-no-longer-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GI Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.gravity.net.uk/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have announced that Chrome is out of Beta, and showing improvements for plugin support, most notably video speed improvements.

It also contains an updated javascript engine, claiming that it operates 1.4 times faster than the beta version, and work has begun on an extensions platform to allow easier integration with the browser by third parties.
http://www.google.com/chrome
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have announced that <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/google-chrome-beta.html">Chrome is out of Beta</a>, and showing improvements for plugin support, most notably video speed improvements.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-139 alignnone" title="chrome" src="http://community.gravity.net.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/chrome-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="168" height="120" /></p>
<p>It also contains an updated javascript engine, claiming that it operates 1.4 times faster than the beta version, and work has begun on an extensions platform to allow easier integration with the browser by third parties.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/chrome</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://community.gravity.net.uk/2008/12/google-chrome-browser-no-longer-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
